Now that I had two more-or-less complete shoulder sections, it was time to start thinking about the girdle section. The first stop on that train of thought was connecting the girdle to the shoulders. (What's that? I skipped the part about connecting the shoulders to each other first? Stay tuned for the next update!)
For Newstead and/or Corbridge B/C, the girdle hangs from the shoulders via hooks and eyes. As suggested by Matthew Amt, I made these by flattening one end of a 3/16" brass rod, annealing 3 or 4 times during the process. Below is the first hook after hammering... you can see I wasn't hitting it very straight in the early stages since it looks a little lopsided.
Fortunately the lopsidedness doesn't matter since this will be going on the inside of the girdle band. Following the much discussed but never published Stillfried artifacts, my hooks are riveted on the inside and then pass through the girdle band itself, as shown below.
For the sake of simplicity I put a 7/32" hole in the band to provide some additional wiggle room for the bent shaft.
I have installed my hooks with screws for the moment since I plan to anneal the rod shaft before doing the final bending -- which will happen after the girdle sections are assembled. Below - one of my work stations up at the cottage, with more hooks in progress.
For now the matching eyes for the hooks are simply holes punched in the back and breast plates. I will add the decorative brass work a bit later -- ideally after I've figured out how to get my repousse work to really pop out the way I want it to.
Tuesday, 30 August 2011
Cottage Part 1: Carlisle Hinges Revisited
All right, so I forgot to take some pictures of the cleanup work on the Carlisle hinges, but there wasn't a whole lot to see. As previously mentioned, I used a grinding stone on my dremel to smooth out the rough edges as best as I could, and "finished" the rest with needle files. I think there's still room for improvement, but until I have a realistic method of buffing these I'm not going to worry about it. As previously noted, these hinges are only 5 cm wide, while historical accuracy would require something in the range of 6-7.5 cm. I'm just saving material since this is still the prototype.
Cutting out the triangles turned out to be much more difficult than anticipated, possibly because I was using too soft of a backstop (wood) for most of it. (I was using a chisel...) Anyways, as a result the hinge plates bent back and forth quite a bit and had to be hammered flat repeatedly. This means the edges of the cuts aren't very clean - the metal around the edges is a bit wrinkled from the stretching and compressing. On the bright side, my hinge plates are probably pretty close to full hardness after all the hammering.
Some of the more observant might notice the stamped rings around the rivet holes -- Historically, this seemed to be a common "decorative" feature of hinge and buckle plates. However, the circles you see here are not decorative, but accidental! They are a byproduct of the whitney punch being maladjusted. This made me wonder whether the "decorative" rings on historical finds might also just be a side effect of the punch used to make the holes - but I haven't looked into it.
Monday, 29 August 2011
Cottage Hoard Uncovered!
Back from the cottage. Less progress than expected - the devil is always in the details. Still, the prototype cuirass is approaching completion. Details to be posted soon-ish.
Wednesday, 17 August 2011
Delayed Updates
I've been splitting my time between "real-life" concerns, and some research for future armour work. Next week I'm heading up to the cottage, so I've been reading up on some different things to work on and collecting some of the necessary tools and materials.
I'm hoping to finish the prototype cuirass while I'm up there, and might start on a side project or two. Foremost on the to-do list is to practice my punch, chisel, and repousse skills so I can make some belt plates. Next on the list is to work on riveting with both copper wire and nails (still no local source for off-the-shelf solid copper rivets). I may also work on putting a manica together.
I was also hoping to try some wire inlay, after adapting some concrete nails into the appropriate shapes. Since I won't get a chance to visit a bench grinder before going away, I'm not sure if that will actually happen - I doubt I can do it with just chisels, but I might try anyways.
Anyways, while I will be away from the internet for most if not all of next week, I will still be taking pictures of my work. Once I'm back, I'll start posting the new material in batches while I play catch up.
See you around!
I'm hoping to finish the prototype cuirass while I'm up there, and might start on a side project or two. Foremost on the to-do list is to practice my punch, chisel, and repousse skills so I can make some belt plates. Next on the list is to work on riveting with both copper wire and nails (still no local source for off-the-shelf solid copper rivets). I may also work on putting a manica together.
I was also hoping to try some wire inlay, after adapting some concrete nails into the appropriate shapes. Since I won't get a chance to visit a bench grinder before going away, I'm not sure if that will actually happen - I doubt I can do it with just chisels, but I might try anyways.
Anyways, while I will be away from the internet for most if not all of next week, I will still be taking pictures of my work. Once I'm back, I'll start posting the new material in batches while I play catch up.
See you around!
Friday, 12 August 2011
Carlisle Hinges
Back to the dremel - time to rough out the shape of my next set of hinges. I plan to use Carlisle-style hinges on my final version, so that's what I made today. At 5cm, these are wider than all of the other hinges I've made so far; but they are actually still too small. The real ones were around 6-7.5cm wide!
This time I wrapped the plates in painter's tape - it's like masking tape, but less sticky. That makes it easy to peel off without leaving a residue. I sketched out the rough cuts in pencil for the bulk removal - after the big chunks were gone I would need to do some finer shaping.
I am getting much better with the dremel, but I still need to learn more. I did all of this shaping using only a cut-off disc. Need to smooth things out a bit more with needle files, but otherwise not too bad!
On second thought, I should try some of the smaller dremel grinding stones first, and then use the needle files for those little nooks and crannies... hrm.
This time I wrapped the plates in painter's tape - it's like masking tape, but less sticky. That makes it easy to peel off without leaving a residue. I sketched out the rough cuts in pencil for the bulk removal - after the big chunks were gone I would need to do some finer shaping.
I am getting much better with the dremel, but I still need to learn more. I did all of this shaping using only a cut-off disc. Need to smooth things out a bit more with needle files, but otherwise not too bad!
On second thought, I should try some of the smaller dremel grinding stones first, and then use the needle files for those little nooks and crannies... hrm.
Thursday, 11 August 2011
New Leathering Method in Practice
I decided to put my theory into practice, to see if it could repair my faulty shoulder section. The short answer is... YES! The only thing I changed was the holes in the straps!
Below: Series of pictures demonstrating how the leathers flex when you raise your arm. Note how the front & rear leathers stay flat and relaxed - only the central leather has to move. You could optimize this by using a thicker leather on the front & rear and a thinner one centrally.
Some pictures of the releathering process...
Attach central leather to set the minimum overlap.
Below: After attaching the central leather, I am tilting the lame to the desired angle so I can mark the new hole locations on the straps. Note how this results in more overlap at the front & back than it does in the center.
(You don't strictly need to clamp things in place, but it definitely helped me to take pictures of the process. )
Again, attach central leather first to select overlap.
Angle the plates, mark the holes, etc.
My mirror is dirty... need some windex.
Here are the leathers from inside that shoulder section...
Purple dots - original rivet placements (BEFORE picture)
Green dots - revised rivet placements (AFTER picture)
Below: The same image, except I have clearly labelled which sets of holes go together.
Below: Series of pictures demonstrating how the leathers flex when you raise your arm. Note how the front & rear leathers stay flat and relaxed - only the central leather has to move. You could optimize this by using a thicker leather on the front & rear and a thinner one centrally.
Some pictures of the releathering process...
Attach central leather to set the minimum overlap.
Below: After attaching the central leather, I am tilting the lame to the desired angle so I can mark the new hole locations on the straps. Note how this results in more overlap at the front & back than it does in the center.
(You don't strictly need to clamp things in place, but it definitely helped me to take pictures of the process. )
Again, attach central leather first to select overlap.
Angle the plates, mark the holes, etc.
My mirror is dirty... need some windex.
Maybe a little bit too much clamping....
Here are the leathers from inside that shoulder section...
Purple dots - original rivet placements (BEFORE picture)
Green dots - revised rivet placements (AFTER picture)
Below: The same image, except I have clearly labelled which sets of holes go together.
Wednesday, 10 August 2011
A different method of leathering shoulders
I'm going to introduce a "pet theory" here, so excuse my prefatory rambling while I set up for my point. A fair bit of thought and self-doubt went into it, but I've managed to satisfy myself that this is worthy of consideration, so here it is...
After a fair bit of reading here and there, and asking around on RAT, I couldn't find any "unearthed" historical evidence on exactly how shoulderguards were leathered or how much overlap there was between the plates. As far as I can tell, the only thing we do know is the pattern of rivet holes where the leather was attached and the width of the shoulder lames. It would seem that this is largely due to the fact that in all present finds, leather survives only as mineralized fragments near rivets - it tends to rot away without being preserved for future study.
We do, however, have some pictorial evidence - the occasional stele, frieze, and of course Trajan's column (whose authenticity with detail is widely doubted.) While my investigation of these depictions can hardly be called exhaustive, I was struck by one element which seems to remain constant - The lesser shoulder plates just barely cup or cover the shoulder and then stop.
I believe this is a reliable datum, since it seems to persist across different time periods and styles. And examining the "digital reconstructions" included in Bishop's Lorica Segmentata, Volume I: A Handbook of Articulated Roman Plate Armour, it would seem that I am not entirely alone in this belief.
Furthermore, a helpful RAT member has confirmed that a contemporary source listed 5'6" (in modern units) as the preferred minimum height for a legionary. While this doesn't mean that there weren't any legionary midgets, it does suggest that most legionaries were slightly taller. A quick check on google informs me that the average male height in the US, Canada, and UK is about 5'9", from which I conclude that the average legionary shoulder width was not significantly different from modern people.
So if we know the width of the plates, the width of the shoulders, and how far they should reach on the shoulder/arm, the amount of overlap can be deduced to a certain extent. We also know from unearthed plates where the rivet holes go. Great! We've answered the question of how the shoulders were leathered... or have we?
While trying to reach the answers summarized above, I ended up looking at more than a few pictures of reenactor's seggies. (This was motivated in part by the problems with my first complete shoulder. ) One detail which appears to a greater or lesser extent in a number of different people's photos of both Corbridge and Newstead seggies is lesser shoulder lames hanging in a "stepped" pattern. I've taken an edge-on shot of my own shoulder to provide an exaggerated example of what I mean - below.
This is a natural result of a riveting the edges of inflexible plates to a flexible strap. You can minimize the visibility of this phenomenon by either loosening and/or narrowing your rivets, or by increasing the floppiness of your strap. The latter option has the added bonus of helping the lames to lie down on your upper arm instead of rigidly projecting from your shoulder; but this requires thinner leather, constant/careful oiling, a long break-in phase, a different part of the animal hide, or some combination of the above.
But what if there was another option? One which gave a more "natural" shape to the lesser shoulder guards even with thicker and/or less flexible leather?
While trying to resolve the issues in my own segmentata, I sat down with this proto-shoulder and experimented quite a bit with the position of both lame and leather holes. While some options were better than others, nothing ever really looked 'right' when draped over my shoulder. Eventually, I decided to ignore what I "knew" about leathering and just try to make exactly the look I wanted - by building the shoulder curve into the spacing of the holes on my leather. Instant success! Not only that, but the funny-looking "stepped" pattern is gone too.
Initial Attempt - Mild curve, Leathers widely angled
The only "secret" here is that the spacing of the holes on the front & rear straps is smaller than the spacing of the holes on the central strap. When the shoulder is right-side up, the load is still distributed evenly among the three leathers -- the tension needed to tuck in the corners of the plate is negligible. It doesn't appear to affect mobility very much -- lifting the arm up requires flexion only in the central leather, and reaching forward-and-back motion is no different from the typical leathering method. I also think that pre-tilting the plates this way might allow the armour to "shed" glancing blows with less stress on the leathers. (We would need a reenactor to try this leathering method in order to get more concrete answers on these suppositions).
In terms of looking at the shoulder edge-on, this method greatly reduces the bizarre "see-through plate armour" issue, but the effect on protection against edge-on attacks would be negligible at best. However, it does ensure that the lesser shoulder more closely "cups" the shoulder -- just as it is depicted in friezes and steles. Given the level of detail in such depictions and the nature of artistic license, it's difficult to determine if there is any significance to this, but one can always hope. :)
One might think that this would not have been used historically because it reduces the "stackability" of a segmentata, but this is in fact false. When placed flat on the ground, the central leather flexes and the lames all lie flat, just as is it does with the leathering method traditionally employed by reconstructionists -- I had to carefully position the shoulder guards to take the pictures shown here of the inverted shoulders.
Second attempt - More pronounced curve, and leathers follow a straighter rivetting pattern.
So in conclusion, I submit this as my own "speculative reconstruction" of the leathering of a segmentata shoulder section - one which to the best of my knowledge is compatible with all unearthed artifacts and historical depictions.
After a fair bit of reading here and there, and asking around on RAT, I couldn't find any "unearthed" historical evidence on exactly how shoulderguards were leathered or how much overlap there was between the plates. As far as I can tell, the only thing we do know is the pattern of rivet holes where the leather was attached and the width of the shoulder lames. It would seem that this is largely due to the fact that in all present finds, leather survives only as mineralized fragments near rivets - it tends to rot away without being preserved for future study.
We do, however, have some pictorial evidence - the occasional stele, frieze, and of course Trajan's column (whose authenticity with detail is widely doubted.) While my investigation of these depictions can hardly be called exhaustive, I was struck by one element which seems to remain constant - The lesser shoulder plates just barely cup or cover the shoulder and then stop.
I believe this is a reliable datum, since it seems to persist across different time periods and styles. And examining the "digital reconstructions" included in Bishop's Lorica Segmentata, Volume I: A Handbook of Articulated Roman Plate Armour, it would seem that I am not entirely alone in this belief.
Furthermore, a helpful RAT member has confirmed that a contemporary source listed 5'6" (in modern units) as the preferred minimum height for a legionary. While this doesn't mean that there weren't any legionary midgets, it does suggest that most legionaries were slightly taller. A quick check on google informs me that the average male height in the US, Canada, and UK is about 5'9", from which I conclude that the average legionary shoulder width was not significantly different from modern people.
So if we know the width of the plates, the width of the shoulders, and how far they should reach on the shoulder/arm, the amount of overlap can be deduced to a certain extent. We also know from unearthed plates where the rivet holes go. Great! We've answered the question of how the shoulders were leathered... or have we?
While trying to reach the answers summarized above, I ended up looking at more than a few pictures of reenactor's seggies. (This was motivated in part by the problems with my first complete shoulder. ) One detail which appears to a greater or lesser extent in a number of different people's photos of both Corbridge and Newstead seggies is lesser shoulder lames hanging in a "stepped" pattern. I've taken an edge-on shot of my own shoulder to provide an exaggerated example of what I mean - below.
This is a natural result of a riveting the edges of inflexible plates to a flexible strap. You can minimize the visibility of this phenomenon by either loosening and/or narrowing your rivets, or by increasing the floppiness of your strap. The latter option has the added bonus of helping the lames to lie down on your upper arm instead of rigidly projecting from your shoulder; but this requires thinner leather, constant/careful oiling, a long break-in phase, a different part of the animal hide, or some combination of the above.
But what if there was another option? One which gave a more "natural" shape to the lesser shoulder guards even with thicker and/or less flexible leather?
While trying to resolve the issues in my own segmentata, I sat down with this proto-shoulder and experimented quite a bit with the position of both lame and leather holes. While some options were better than others, nothing ever really looked 'right' when draped over my shoulder. Eventually, I decided to ignore what I "knew" about leathering and just try to make exactly the look I wanted - by building the shoulder curve into the spacing of the holes on my leather. Instant success! Not only that, but the funny-looking "stepped" pattern is gone too.
Initial Attempt - Mild curve, Leathers widely angled
The only "secret" here is that the spacing of the holes on the front & rear straps is smaller than the spacing of the holes on the central strap. When the shoulder is right-side up, the load is still distributed evenly among the three leathers -- the tension needed to tuck in the corners of the plate is negligible. It doesn't appear to affect mobility very much -- lifting the arm up requires flexion only in the central leather, and reaching forward-and-back motion is no different from the typical leathering method. I also think that pre-tilting the plates this way might allow the armour to "shed" glancing blows with less stress on the leathers. (We would need a reenactor to try this leathering method in order to get more concrete answers on these suppositions).
In terms of looking at the shoulder edge-on, this method greatly reduces the bizarre "see-through plate armour" issue, but the effect on protection against edge-on attacks would be negligible at best. However, it does ensure that the lesser shoulder more closely "cups" the shoulder -- just as it is depicted in friezes and steles. Given the level of detail in such depictions and the nature of artistic license, it's difficult to determine if there is any significance to this, but one can always hope. :)
One might think that this would not have been used historically because it reduces the "stackability" of a segmentata, but this is in fact false. When placed flat on the ground, the central leather flexes and the lames all lie flat, just as is it does with the leathering method traditionally employed by reconstructionists -- I had to carefully position the shoulder guards to take the pictures shown here of the inverted shoulders.
Second attempt - More pronounced curve, and leathers follow a straighter rivetting pattern.
So in conclusion, I submit this as my own "speculative reconstruction" of the leathering of a segmentata shoulder section - one which to the best of my knowledge is compatible with all unearthed artifacts and historical depictions.
Tuesday, 9 August 2011
Not dead yet
I've been revising some of my thinking about leathering, but I might make a short post later tonight. I've also been spending the last few days pondering how I'm going to do the breast/backplate closures and the girth hoop closures.
Last night I bought a pile of fabric for making a tunic and/or part of a subarmalis. I've been thinking about making a subarmalis loosely patterned on a greek linothorax/spolas as sort of a "dressy undress uniform". We'll see how it goes. Might pick up some more fabric/materials tonight.
Last night I bought a pile of fabric for making a tunic and/or part of a subarmalis. I've been thinking about making a subarmalis loosely patterned on a greek linothorax/spolas as sort of a "dressy undress uniform". We'll see how it goes. Might pick up some more fabric/materials tonight.
Saturday, 6 August 2011
Adventures in Leathering and Assembly
OK - As previously mentioned, I put holes in the lesser shoulder plates according to a pattern I was working from, and that turned out to have been a poor choice. Anyways, no pictures of that process, but I will be outlining a leathering method of my own devising in the next post. Above is our starting point - for better or worse, the lesser shoulder plates are assembled, and now we want to attach the upper shoulder guard and breastplate assembly. As you can see above, I've laid the plates out flat so I can check how they are lining up while still accessing the central leather. In this pic I've already marked and cut the holes on the central leather - that's the easy part. Now we need to do the sides.
As you can see in the picture above, (and in several other pictures from recent posts) I sort of traced the strap outlines on the breast and back plates -- this was done while holding them upright (as though the shoulder was being worn). After I marked the outline of where the strap would run, I eyeballed it and marked an "X" for the riveting point near the center of the plates.
After drilling the holes, I repeated the "hold upright and lay strap against plate" process, but this time I used a screwdriver to push through the new hole in the plate and mark the location on the strap. Then all that remained was to punch the hole in the strap and connect the plates.
Below, I have connected the breast plates to all three leathers. It's now time to attach the front and rear leathers to the upper shoulderguard - which turned out to be the most annoying part of the process of all. Below, all plates are attached on the central leather -- only the front and rear leather remain to be completed.
I planned to use the same technique -- I'd fold the plates up as though the shoulder was being worn, and then mark the outlines of the strap on the plate. This turned out to be a lot more difficult than I thought, with plates flapping all over the place, lames twisting out of true alignment, etc. Then I tried setting the whole unit on a stump and tried to let gravity do the work for me:
Unfortunately, this made it more or less impossible to see or reach the parts I needed to reach. Part of the problem here was in getting the upper shoulder to lie down properly on the collar pieces -- I'll talk more about that in a moment. Anyways, after several minutes of hell trying to figure out how to do it I applied some engineering wisdom and solved the problem with duct tape.
That let me get inside to mark the outlines of the straps with my piece of soapstone.
However, while I was in there, I noticed a major problem in the making:
One of my leathers was running right across the corner of a plate, right along the hinge line. That would probably wear out the strap and break it in no time!
So when I marked the riveting point on the upper shoulder, I deliberately put it a bit low on that side to force the leather to move away from the hinge line.
The moment of truth!
So there's a couple of problems with this shoulder. The top two issues:
1. Upper Shoulder Doesn't Fit Well.
This is because I took what is essentially a Corbridge A shoulder unit and attached it to a Newstead breast/collar/back plate set. The central upper shoulder plate isn't wide enough to match the curve of the mid collar plate - In order to make things lie nice and flat, the upper shoulder front & back plates would have to make a sharp curve right in the middle of the hinge face.
2. Lesser Shoulder Plates Don't Hang Properly
There are several potential causes for this, not least of which is wrong holes, wrong leather, wrong angles, etc. Solving this issue is the topic of my next post.
Friday, 5 August 2011
Second Set of Breast/Back/Collar Plates (Long Weekend Part 3 of 3)
I cut out the three plates - breast, midcollar, and back as before. I made an error on the breastplate's neck hole - since it wasn't fatal I decided to ignore it since this is a prototype unit anyways. However, I did fold it a bit differently to try to hide the error, as shown below. Purple line indicates approximately where I should have made the original cut, which I hid by progressively shrinking the width of the fold.
As previously mentioned, I attempted to copy the folded & flared look shown in Peter Connelly's drawings of lorica segmentatae. This turned out to be easier than I expected, although I still managed to make a mistake or two in my rush to get these pieces done. For the first plate, I folded the edges as described in this post, except that I switched to the planishing hammer much earlier -- when the fold was still about 45 degrees away from being finished. This resulted in a much neater edge, as seen above.
To flare the edge, I positioned the plate on the anvil such that the fold was hanging over the edge a little bit. (Sorry, no action shot. Maybe next time.) Some gentle hammering along the edge of the closed fold was enough to flare the metal over the edge of the anvil, resulting in exactly the desired result. The trick here is to move the plate along the edge of the anvil to follow the curve of the neck so that you end up with a flare with a constant width. Results are illustrated below.
On the second and third plate, I speeded up this process by starting the flaring before the fold was completely closed -- basically I merged the flaring passes with the last couple of fold-closing passes. This turned out just fine, so I will probably continue to do things this way from now on.
I had originally intended to practice rolling edges a bit more, but since that takes much more time & effort I decided to skip it this time. Perhaps I will practice it on the edge of a lesser shoulder guard plate later on.
When I got home and compared my two sets of backplates, I realized I had made a very basic error -- my folded edges were at slightly different heights because I didn't bother to check the second one against the first one. I guess if I had cut out and hammered both left and right sides at the same time, I wouldn't have made this mistake, but it's something to keep in mind in the future.
Comparison of the mostly-assembled first shoulder and the new neck plates.
As previously mentioned, I attempted to copy the folded & flared look shown in Peter Connelly's drawings of lorica segmentatae. This turned out to be easier than I expected, although I still managed to make a mistake or two in my rush to get these pieces done. For the first plate, I folded the edges as described in this post, except that I switched to the planishing hammer much earlier -- when the fold was still about 45 degrees away from being finished. This resulted in a much neater edge, as seen above.
To flare the edge, I positioned the plate on the anvil such that the fold was hanging over the edge a little bit. (Sorry, no action shot. Maybe next time.) Some gentle hammering along the edge of the closed fold was enough to flare the metal over the edge of the anvil, resulting in exactly the desired result. The trick here is to move the plate along the edge of the anvil to follow the curve of the neck so that you end up with a flare with a constant width. Results are illustrated below.
On the second and third plate, I speeded up this process by starting the flaring before the fold was completely closed -- basically I merged the flaring passes with the last couple of fold-closing passes. This turned out just fine, so I will probably continue to do things this way from now on.
I had originally intended to practice rolling edges a bit more, but since that takes much more time & effort I decided to skip it this time. Perhaps I will practice it on the edge of a lesser shoulder guard plate later on.
When I got home and compared my two sets of backplates, I realized I had made a very basic error -- my folded edges were at slightly different heights because I didn't bother to check the second one against the first one. I guess if I had cut out and hammered both left and right sides at the same time, I wouldn't have made this mistake, but it's something to keep in mind in the future.
Comparison of the mostly-assembled first shoulder and the new neck plates.
Thursday, 4 August 2011
Tuesday, 2 August 2011
Learning from my mistakes - First shoulder unit. (Long Weekend Part 2)
Next time I will do the leathering more sensibly and take pictures along the way. For now, I will just give a summary of things I've learned from attempting to assemble my first complete shoulder unit.
1.
I had (unwisely) punched holes in my shoulder lames according to the pattern I was working from, and as a result my leathering did not turn out as quite as smoothly as I had hoped. One of the more noticeable issues is that part of the side straps are visible between lesser shoulder plates 3 & 4 because the holes were too close to the edge of the plates. In the future, I will follow the more sensible advice from Alex Matras in his pdf - more on that in a future post.
2.
Less obvious is the slight bunching/twisting (shown above) of the shoulder leather to reach the holes in each lame. This may look like I just goofed up on placing the holes in the leather, but the actual problem is that the leather is trying to bend in a zig-zag pattern to reach the holes. I think this is what is causing the shoulder to be so stiff - Note how in this picture (further above), the lesser shoulders remain horizontal even when unsupported, instead of drooping to cover the upper arm. My choice of leather may also be to blame for this issue - perhaps I should have used something softer and more flexible? (i.e. thinner)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3.
Attaching hinges to the breastplate - I had a bit of trouble trying to get the hinged breastplate/backplate sections to overlap correctly with the mid-collar plate. The biggest problem was that I had put the rivet holes in the hinge plate very close to the hinge tube, making it difficult to get an overlap which would not bump into the rivets as seen in my previous post about the upper shoulder. I should be able to correct this on my next set of hinges by placing the rivet holes a bit further back from the hinge tube, giving me more room to work with.
The other issue with making these plates overlap is getting the folded edges to play well together. You can see in some of these pictures that I had to bend one plate a bit to make things snug up properly.
Also seen in the above pictures -- Markings for leathering attachments. This post is already getting pretty long so I'll talk about those later.
I will also need to purchase more nuts & screws -- I have used up 48 of them just for these four hinges! Upon checking diagrams of historical hinges, I realized that there should only be five instead of six -- oh well. As previously mentioned, these weren't historically accurate shapes anyways.
Below - closeup of my unfinished "Kalkriese-Inspired" hinge on the breastplate/midcollar plate. You'll note that I haven't even peened the hinge pin on this one. In the background you can see where I've marked the leathering point on the backplate.
----------------------------------
4.
Folding the mid-collar plate. You can see here (above) that I ended up with a few kinks in my nice folded edge. These were introduced while I was bending the plate, despite attempting to avoid this exact problem. I wonder if I should be folding the edge on this part AFTER it has already been bent... that would be much harder, though. Maybe I should start the fold, but leave it not quite closed? Now that I've thought about it some more, I suspect the kinks formed in places where I had dinged the fold a bit, creating stress concentrators. Maybe a better-finished fold would kink up less? Anyways, this is something I'll have to ponder after I've tried again with my second mid-collar plate.
Next post - Conclusion of progress from the long weekend. I will talk about about the new breast/back plate combo I made and hammered. After that - Installation of the final leathering points on the back/breastplate and upper shoulder guard.
1.
I had (unwisely) punched holes in my shoulder lames according to the pattern I was working from, and as a result my leathering did not turn out as quite as smoothly as I had hoped. One of the more noticeable issues is that part of the side straps are visible between lesser shoulder plates 3 & 4 because the holes were too close to the edge of the plates. In the future, I will follow the more sensible advice from Alex Matras in his pdf - more on that in a future post.
2.
Less obvious is the slight bunching/twisting (shown above) of the shoulder leather to reach the holes in each lame. This may look like I just goofed up on placing the holes in the leather, but the actual problem is that the leather is trying to bend in a zig-zag pattern to reach the holes. I think this is what is causing the shoulder to be so stiff - Note how in this picture (further above), the lesser shoulders remain horizontal even when unsupported, instead of drooping to cover the upper arm. My choice of leather may also be to blame for this issue - perhaps I should have used something softer and more flexible? (i.e. thinner)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3.
Attaching hinges to the breastplate - I had a bit of trouble trying to get the hinged breastplate/backplate sections to overlap correctly with the mid-collar plate. The biggest problem was that I had put the rivet holes in the hinge plate very close to the hinge tube, making it difficult to get an overlap which would not bump into the rivets as seen in my previous post about the upper shoulder. I should be able to correct this on my next set of hinges by placing the rivet holes a bit further back from the hinge tube, giving me more room to work with.
The other issue with making these plates overlap is getting the folded edges to play well together. You can see in some of these pictures that I had to bend one plate a bit to make things snug up properly.
Also seen in the above pictures -- Markings for leathering attachments. This post is already getting pretty long so I'll talk about those later.
I will also need to purchase more nuts & screws -- I have used up 48 of them just for these four hinges! Upon checking diagrams of historical hinges, I realized that there should only be five instead of six -- oh well. As previously mentioned, these weren't historically accurate shapes anyways.
Below - closeup of my unfinished "Kalkriese-Inspired" hinge on the breastplate/midcollar plate. You'll note that I haven't even peened the hinge pin on this one. In the background you can see where I've marked the leathering point on the backplate.
----------------------------------
4.
Folding the mid-collar plate. You can see here (above) that I ended up with a few kinks in my nice folded edge. These were introduced while I was bending the plate, despite attempting to avoid this exact problem. I wonder if I should be folding the edge on this part AFTER it has already been bent... that would be much harder, though. Maybe I should start the fold, but leave it not quite closed? Now that I've thought about it some more, I suspect the kinks formed in places where I had dinged the fold a bit, creating stress concentrators. Maybe a better-finished fold would kink up less? Anyways, this is something I'll have to ponder after I've tried again with my second mid-collar plate.
Next post - Conclusion of progress from the long weekend. I will talk about about the new breast/back plate combo I made and hammered. After that - Installation of the final leathering points on the back/breastplate and upper shoulder guard.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)